I just did a quick Google Search on
'David Hasslehoff' paired with the word
'Drunk.'There were 668, 000 results that turned up, and the first two links are both YOU TUBE links straight to the video of Mr.
Hasslehoff in his
drunken state. The videos are from two different users who are members of
You Tube, but there are (of course) links from thousands of other sites, too. Sites such as: 'ifilm' dot com and 'liveleak' dot com and a site called 'nationalledger' dot com. Right under the
National Ledger site is a link from the 'snarkygossip' site.
The man RELAPSED for gosh-sake...
What is worse...I have followed some threads in forums that stemmed from this incident and resulting video. It's not so much the fact that this man, regardless of his celebrity status, has to overcome the bad press, but that the topic of
David Hasslehoff's intoxication incident is still drawing such comments as...
"he should discipline himself and that kind of stuff won't happen"
and
"he can get away with it because he's a celebrity"
and
"he is disgusting, gaining publicity through an awful stunt like that - that's what it was - a publicity stunt"
Somehow, even with all the information at a general public's ready convenience and consumption, a great number of people still do not know a darned thing about substance abuse.
There are arguments back and forth all the time about:
"It's a habit" versus "it's a disease"
and "it's not just a habit" versus "it's not really a disease" and so forth...
WHO CARES?
All the efforts in the WORLD to define the habit/disease of substance abuse is not getting people to the point of SOBRIETY...
BOTH ARGUMENTS have their drawbacks!
If
alcoholism/
addiction IS a disease - then there are many who will take advantage of this concept to say, "I can't help myself - it's a DISEASE!"
If
alcoholism/
addiction is merely a habit - it is not enough to just "knock it off and get on with life."
Many of those who are outspoken about the issue and who are on the 'criticizing' side of alcoholism/addiction no matter which explanation is used - are misunderstanding the depth of the problem - as well as assigning BLAME on the individual...in both cases of the 'habit' versus 'disease' argument.
It's more complex than that...
While ultimately, an
addict is responsible for picking up
drugs, picking up the bottle and it is a choice of sorts, there are dozens of other contributing factors that should not be overlooked - one of the TOP factors, in the case of celebrities, is PUBLIC PRESSURE and lack of privacy! (not to meantion 'means' - celebrities often have the money to buy
drugs and alcohol freely, in generous amounts).
I don't think that either argument is sufficient to explain a myriad of serious problems that come along with addictions. Certainly, showing videotapes of
drunken actors/celebrities isn't going to further any kind of argument - but will instead - raise questions about
RIGHTS OF PRIVACY!
Some parts of addiction are, indeed, 'habit-based' - but some aspects of
addiction fall into less tangible areas where the addict's chemical balance of the body are mainly out of the addict's control - UNLESS the
addict simply ABSTAINS from
drugs and alcohol.
I wish less time were spent with people making statements about "It's a habit" or "It's a disease!"
In both cases - or despite both arguments, one thing is certain...
Addiction/
Alcoholism doesn't have to be fatal.
People who believe in the 'disease' concept and act accordingly do quite as well as those who change their habits...in both cases,
addicts who successfully
recover and stay in
recovery will change their habits to more positive, regular habits and changed lifestyles. People who have other illnesses often make changes to their lifestyles and greatly improve their health, as well. Few people will freak out and argue against someone with Huntingon's or Multiple Sclerosis that they should just 'change their habits...' or 'they wouldn't have Huntington's if they would just behave and gain some self-discipline.'
Anyhow - I thought the
'David Hasselhoff Drunk' incident would taper off - it's been 'OLD NEWS' for over a month now...but some further checking showed me that AVID BLOGGERS are just starting to EXPLOIT THIS VIDEO of Mr.
Hasslehoff...I'm seeing brand new blogs go up - all dedicated to just 'David's Awful Problem and Behavior' (HELLO, PEOPLE...he's
recovered himself - put out a statement HIMSELF that he had a 'slip' but is now in better shape, and clean.), other celebrity 'incident' sites, detailing ALL NASTY, GOSSIPY information...dates, June 1 2007 and - many of the 668, 000 sites that I just searched for are
blog posts and site posts made just within the last week.
Do a quick search, yourself, if you don't believe me...and check the dates...these 'incidents' are being grossly exploited now, starting TODAY...and more will go up tomorrow, too...
How much 'news' is enough for you where celebrities are concerned?
Do you need to know what they had for supper and whether they had an
alcoholic beverage with their supper?
With the other 'celebrity'
addict problems - Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton...I've noticed that many '
blog marketing' individuals have picked up the 'Celebrity Addict' topic as a NEW NICHE for MAKING MONEY with!
Making money by typing gossip on the internet. It's INFORMATION - It's a service, right? People read it, right? People want it?
(I don't anymore)
All in all, I wonder - if a time capsule is made TODAY and 'celebrity magazines' from today are thrown in...what will people think of North American (possibly 'Global') society 100 or 200 years from now when they open up the time capsule from TODAY and see all the 'blurbs' about Celebrity
Drunks and
Addicts?
I do have an account at YOU TUBE - and I did go there and watch the video - many weeks ago when it was first posted. I refuse to put the video here on this
blog, even though this
blog template and setup conveniently lets me post videos straight from You Tube.
I have recently been having a very difficult time trying to sort out my own 'ethical' issues over the past 6 months or so - with regard to how much I do or do not know about celebrities and their personal problems...
Should I buy magazines with this personal exploitation of celebrities inside? (I don't anymore - I haven't for about 4 years)
Should I watch the News when stories about the
Drunk Celebrities come on?
For the past few months, I have REFUSED to purchase even local NEWSPAPERS unless I have a PURPOSE in mind - like needing to view the 'classified' section. I DO NOT BUY them for 'entertainment' at all - and have not for over a year.
It's not just the Internet that is bad. My own local
Calgary news channels on television are really awful right now.
I cut my TV service off almost 3 months ago, so I have just a few channels, mostly local, to watch. I like certain celebrities and want to hear about them, but if what I see is a news broadcaster talking - with a picture of a selected celebrity in the background, I don't bother watching (this setup is usually a 'gossip' draw where the news person is spreading gossip and the pic is shown to visually draw viewers). If I see a celebrity I like and they are actually ON THE SHOW being interviewed or if a clip is being shown of them speaking (such as at a fund-raising event or something) then I will watch for a while because what I am viewing is the words of the celebrity his or herself.
I still find myself changing the stations ALL THE TIME when a clip about "Paris Hilton" or "Britney Spears" comes on - because it's not NEWS...it's a clip telling me what I DO NOT NEED TO KNOW about Paris or Britney...or David...Or Mel Gibson...Or
How many Celebrities can you think of in the past 6mo who have been treated this way by the media?
tr~~
